On Robert A. M. Stern (1939-2025)

I was saddened to hear that Robert A. M. Stern passed away on Thanksgiving. I had the privilege of working with Bob on The Philip Johnson Tapes. Those aren’t idle words: it truly was a privilege.

Robert Stern and myself, with martinis.

I first met Bob at the Philip Johnson symposium at Yale. I was rather surprised he had invited me, as I had been quite critical of his role in recuperating Johnson in the early 1970s, but that was the thing about Bob. He didn’t mind intelligent arguments; he hated stupidity. In contrast, he didn’t invite Franz Schulze, whose biography he felt was too sensationalistic, too eager to pander for sales, and too simplistic in its treatment of the history. It was my first symposium in which I was treated as an equal with the top figures in the field. In no small measure, that invitation led me to my position as director of the Network Architecture Lab at Columbia’s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation.

Soon after, Joan Ockman, director of the Buell Center, asked if I would be willing to work with Bob to edit a series of tapes in which Stern—who had been director of the Buell Center in the 1980s—attempted an oral history of Johnson’s life. I listened to the first two hours and wholeheartedly agreed. This was fascinating material. Little did I know that as the tapes progressed, Johnson’s cardiac condition was deteriorating and the conversation would fall apart toward the end. But Bob and I soldiered on. I would spend three weeks editing a section, send it to him, and he would turn it around that evening from his house in Montauk. Bob’s recall of historical facts was second to none. It seemed to me that he knew every architect who had ever practiced in the city. He was a brilliant mind, and I enjoyed that time very much.

The last time that Bob and I had a chance to spend much time together was at a public conversation about Johnson with the late Henry Urbach in 2012. Henry said that we would have martinis after the conversation. “Oh no,” Bob said, “we will have them during the conversation.” And so it was. I will raise a martini to his memory, as well as to Henry’s tonight. ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Terence Riley Drawing Attention to the Philip Johnson Tapes

Over at Bookforum, Terence Riley reviews the Philip Johnson Tapes. I am thoroughly delighted by the review. The Philip Johnson Tapes was fascinating to put together and its great that it’s getting some attention. 

Two things are worth expanding on. I certainly appreciated Riley’s point that at times the interviews "do little to make Johnson more accessible, underscoring instead how impossibly distant his life experience was from most of ours." Absolutely. As T. J. Clark has written, "modernity is our antiquity."  I am glad the book conveys the foreignness of that time to us.     

When Riley mentions that "the most rigorous of historians will have to look elsewhere" to fact-check certain information on Johnson, it’s unlikely that people will find much more. The archives have largely been exhausted and the team of researchers at Stern’s office did an first-rate job digging up what they could. Here and there, I’m sure we’ll find something, but on the whole, great mysteries are going to remain barring the release of unseen archival material. For example, what was Johnson doing translating Werner Sombart’s Weltanschauung, Science and Economy? What was his involvement with the Veritas press, which was, in part at least, sponsored by the Nazi government? How about his friendship with Viola Bodenschatz, wife of Major General Karl Bodenschatz, Hermann Goering’s top aide? Johnson’s life falls in the inconvenient period in which people neither communicated primarily via letters (his chief letter-writing phase ends around 1931, or so it seems) nor via e-mail but rather via telephone. To address that difficult time, as I explain in my conclusion to the book, historian Allan Nevins developed oral history. And so it is, that with the oral history of Johnson’s life in hand, we’re unlikely to get a whole lot more. 

Once again, for emphasis: modernity is our antiquity.